Fujifilm Neopan Professional Acros 100 II is a black and white film that is ideal for many areas of photography including landscape and mountain photography, portraits, product photography, architectural photography and long exposures. By adopting their new Super Fine Particle Technology Fujifilm have achieved the world's highest level of graininess for a ISO 100 black and white film. Ultra high image quality with three dimensional gradation reproduction. 36 exposures. Price does not include processing.
Fujifilm Neopan Professional Acros 100 II is a black and white film that is ideal for many areas of photography including landscape and mountain photography, portraits, product photography, architectural photography and long exposures. By adopting their new Super Fine Particle Technology Fujifilm have achieved the world's highest level of graininess for a ISO 100 black and white film. Ultra high image quality with three dimensional gradation reproduction. 36 exposures. Price does not include processing.
There are no live offers for 1 Fujifilm Neopan Acros 100 II 135/ 36 Hardware/Electronic right now. The all-time low we recorded was $15.23 on 3 June 2026. Set a price alert to hear when it's back in stock.
Prices last updated 5 Sept 2026.
1 Fujifilm Neopan Acros 100 II 135/ 36 Hardware/Electronic
Fujifilm Neopan Professional Acros 100 II is a black and white film that is ideal for many areas of photography including landscape and mountain photography, portraits, product photography, architectural photography and long exposures. By adopting their new Super Fine Particle Technology Fujifilm have achieved the world's highest level of graininess for a ISO 100 black and white film. Ultra high image quality with three dimensional gradation reproduction. 36 exposures. Price does not include processing.
Fujifilm Neopan Professional Acros 100 II is a black and white film that is ideal for many areas of photography including landscape and mountain photography, portraits, product photography, architectural photography and long exposures. By adopting their new Super Fine Particle Technology Fujifilm have achieved the world's highest level of graininess for a ISO 100 black and white film. Ultra high image quality with three dimensional gradation reproduction. 36 exposures. Price does not include processing.
Last updated at 09/05/2026 09:07:29
Fujifilm Neopan Acros 100 II 35mm
Delivery between 7–15 Sept $9.70
FUJIFILM Black and White Film Neopan 100 ACROS II 135 size 36 shots
Delivery $9.58
Fujifilm Japan Bw Neopan 100 Acros Ii 35mm 36 Pcs 135 Acros100 Np 36ex
Delivery $15.69
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
originally posted on bhphotovideo.com
I like a high-contrast B&W and like to shoot with orange or red filters. I'll add three images from my first Acros II roll, all shot at +1/3 EC (an effective ISO-80). The bright sun on the Chicago Theatre shows results in bright light. The more overcast shots of the Wrigley Building and the Marina Towers could have been +2/3 or +1 EC. Reading other's experiences / suggestions online are to add +1 stop outside of direct sun or similar low(er) light. (BTW these are scanned and edited in LR. I dont think film is 'done' just from being developed.) I was a Neopan Acros user back around 2010 and happy to see this film back. For comparison, I also shot Ilford Delta 400 on the same date with an orange filter also at the same effective ISO-80. The results are nearly ... MoreI like a high-contrast B&W and like to shoot with orange or red filters. I'll add three images from my first Acros II roll, all shot at +1/3 EC (an effective ISO-80). The bright sun on the Chicago Theatre shows results in bright light. The more overcast shots of the Wrigley Building and the Marina Towers could have been +2/3 or +1 EC. Reading other's experiences / suggestions online are to add +1 stop outside of direct sun or similar low(er) light. (BTW these are scanned and edited in LR. I dont think film is 'done' just from being developed.) I was a Neopan Acros user back around 2010 and happy to see this film back. For comparison, I also shot Ilford Delta 400 on the same date with an orange filter also at the same effective ISO-80. The results are nearly identical, with the Fuji have a bit more contrast and a lot less grain, if that observation helps you decide on this film.And as always, ordering from B&H was quick, easy and near immediate delivery.
originally posted on adorama.com
I like this film. It is a good as it gets. I would say it is between this film and Delta 100 as my favorite. It is a film that feels too good for everyday shooting. I feel like I need to save it for perfect shots. The film has a silvery glow and crispness to it. There is very little grain. Film choices can be a bit subjective but Acros stands out for me. If cost wasn't important, it would be my choice consistently when an medium speed film was appropriate. I mostly shoot landscapes and architectural shots. But whatever, I have used Acros for I have been happy with.
originally posted on analoguewonderland.co.uk
Fine grain, charming tonality, all in all a very capable film stock in the right hands. I found myself with a much higher % of "keepers" on the two rolls I have shot, and while that is obviously a highly subjective measurement, I think it must count for something!A clear negative - pun not intended - however is the price. Fuji Across II is certainly not a cheap film and is not something I would recommend to newcomers or those on a budget. Still, as an occasional treat or for those occasions where only the best will do, this film stock is definitely one to consider.
| Style | Photo Accessories |
Fujifilm Neopan Acros 100 II 35mm
Delivery between 7–15 Sept $9.70
FUJIFILM Black and White Film Neopan 100 ACROS II 135 size 36 shots
Delivery $9.58
Fujifilm Japan Bw Neopan 100 Acros Ii 35mm 36 Pcs 135 Acros100 Np 36ex
Delivery $15.69
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
I like a high-contrast B&W and like to shoot with orange or red filters. I'll add three images from my first Acros II roll, all shot at +1/3 EC (an effective ISO-80). The bright sun on the Chicago Theatre shows results in bright light. The more overcast shots of the Wrigley Building and the Marina Towers could have been +2/3 or +1 EC. Reading other's experiences / suggestions online are to add +1 stop outside of direct sun or similar low(er) light. (BTW these are scanned and edited in LR. I dont think film is 'done' just from being developed.) I was a Neopan Acros user back around 2010 and happy to see this film back. For comparison, I also shot Ilford Delta 400 on the same date with an orange filter also at the same effective ISO-80. The results are nearly ... MoreI like a high-contrast B&W and like to shoot with orange or red filters. I'll add three images from my first Acros II roll, all shot at +1/3 EC (an effective ISO-80). The bright sun on the Chicago Theatre shows results in bright light. The more overcast shots of the Wrigley Building and the Marina Towers could have been +2/3 or +1 EC. Reading other's experiences / suggestions online are to add +1 stop outside of direct sun or similar low(er) light. (BTW these are scanned and edited in LR. I dont think film is 'done' just from being developed.) I was a Neopan Acros user back around 2010 and happy to see this film back. For comparison, I also shot Ilford Delta 400 on the same date with an orange filter also at the same effective ISO-80. The results are nearly identical, with the Fuji have a bit more contrast and a lot less grain, if that observation helps you decide on this film.And as always, ordering from B&H was quick, easy and near immediate delivery.
I like this film. It is a good as it gets. I would say it is between this film and Delta 100 as my favorite. It is a film that feels too good for everyday shooting. I feel like I need to save it for perfect shots. The film has a silvery glow and crispness to it. There is very little grain. Film choices can be a bit subjective but Acros stands out for me. If cost wasn't important, it would be my choice consistently when an medium speed film was appropriate. I mostly shoot landscapes and architectural shots. But whatever, I have used Acros for I have been happy with.
Fine grain, charming tonality, all in all a very capable film stock in the right hands. I found myself with a much higher % of "keepers" on the two rolls I have shot, and while that is obviously a highly subjective measurement, I think it must count for something!A clear negative - pun not intended - however is the price. Fuji Across II is certainly not a cheap film and is not something I would recommend to newcomers or those on a budget. Still, as an occasional treat or for those occasions where only the best will do, this film stock is definitely one to consider.
I discovered the original Acros when it had only just been discontinued (so fresh rolls were still available), but before Fuji brought it back to life – much to the delight of its legions of long-time fans as well as newly-converted Acros acolytes like me. I'm not someone who obsesses over minute differences between the "look" you get from different film types, but even to me, the "Acros" look really stands out.I haven't done a scientific comparison, but my initial impression is that Acros II feels every bit as good as its predecessor: low grain, great contrast, sumptuously smooth tones, clear film base and minimal curl for easy scanning and archiving. Its ultra-low reciprocity failure is legendary – one reason why it was popular among astrophotographers doing ... MoreI discovered the original Acros when it had only just been discontinued (so fresh rolls were still available), but before Fuji brought it back to life – much to the delight of its legions of long-time fans as well as newly-converted Acros acolytes like me. I'm not someone who obsesses over minute differences between the "look" you get from different film types, but even to me, the "Acros" look really stands out.I haven't done a scientific comparison, but my initial impression is that Acros II feels every bit as good as its predecessor: low grain, great contrast, sumptuously smooth tones, clear film base and minimal curl for easy scanning and archiving. Its ultra-low reciprocity failure is legendary – one reason why it was popular among astrophotographers doing hours-long exposures of the night sky. I have never attempted anything quite that ambitious, but among my sample images there is a 45-second exposure of a seascape, and it was oddly satisfying to read Fuji's datasheet: "No exposure compensation is required for exposures at shutter speeds of less than 120 seconds."Some reviewers have compared Acros to Rollei Retro 80S. But as much as I like Retro 80S (you can see my five-star review on the product page), I have to admit that the film is unforgiving of underexposure. Acros, on the other hand, handles both under- and over-exposure beautifully. And accurately exposed photos have an almost HDR quality; dodging and burning in the darkroom reveals frankly incredible levels of shadow and highlight detail – detail which I never expected to capture when I pressed the shutter. This is one reason why I love Acros and I'm willing to, at least occasionally, pay a premium price for it – while marketed as a professional film, it is actually also a great choice for beginners and enthusiasts, if only as an occasional treat. It makes me look like a better photographer than I am, and I can think of no higher compliment than that.
I tend to split the 35mm film sector into 3 zones £3-£8 is the value end of the spectrum where the most fun is to be had. The £9- £14 mid price or what I call "more bounce to the ounce" zone where brands put better ingredients into their emulsions. Last the premium zone £15- £20 with this roll in your camera "your photography goes to the next level"Acros 100 ii not only qualifies for the mid zone on its spec but flirts with the premium zone as one of the most expensive BW films in 35mm format. Between me and you this film is fun as well. With Tri- X 400 its I came, I saw, I captured! the essence of photojournalism. Acros 100 ii with its long exposure prowess gives you another dimension in which to capture an image, seriously good fun.The data sheet has 1 (one!) ... MoreI tend to split the 35mm film sector into 3 zones £3-£8 is the value end of the spectrum where the most fun is to be had. The £9- £14 mid price or what I call "more bounce to the ounce" zone where brands put better ingredients into their emulsions. Last the premium zone £15- £20 with this roll in your camera "your photography goes to the next level"Acros 100 ii not only qualifies for the mid zone on its spec but flirts with the premium zone as one of the most expensive BW films in 35mm format. Between me and you this film is fun as well. With Tri- X 400 its I came, I saw, I captured! the essence of photojournalism. Acros 100 ii with its long exposure prowess gives you another dimension in which to capture an image, seriously good fun.The data sheet has 1 (one!) exposure correction for 1000s that's a staggering 16mins, it takes a photon of light 8 mins to travel from the sun to earth! No exposure correction is required for 120s / 2mins.WOW! I had intended to do a Velvia 100 vs Acros 100 ii 8mins long exposure review as Velvia 100 only needs a 2.5 magenta colour correction filter and a +2/3 of a stop lens opening @ 8mins. Acros 100 ii for 8 mins only needs + 1/2 stop increase in lends opening (the same +1/2 a stop opening for 1000s).Poor technique will spoil your exposure. Don't be put off by reciprocity failure law formulas just read the data sheets relevant section (read up on reciprocity ; film gets less sensitive the more it is exposed to light) or read https://analoguewonderland.co.uk/blogs/best-film/the-best-film-for-pinhole-photography. Cover the eyepiece so stray light doesn't affect your cameras internal light meter when making long exposures. My camera is both manual and aperture priority. In low light with the camera in manual I take a meter reading in the finder and use my Lee ProGlass ND filter app (any app will do) to calculate what ND (neutral density) filter I need to get 2mins exposure time and adjust shutter speed lens aperture to suit. When ready to shoot, cover the eyepiece and switch to aperture priority. I use the self timer lever also which locks up the mirror helping reduce any blurring of the image. Press the shutter release button, self timer starts then after 10s captures the image, the inside of the lens cap!!! I can't speak for all camera function / procedures but a site that can and is a brilliant resource for classic slrs is www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/photography.htmIf you're on a photographic journey like me, Acros 100 ii is a must, if only to capture where you've been standing for 16mins.
This is the perfect film for long exposures because it does not have reciprocity failure until 2 minutes. I love taking 60 - 90 second exposures with it, especially of rivers and other moving water. Regardless of exposure time, this film really is amazing and is my favorite film even though I do not shoot it often because of the cost. If it was more like $10 I would buy more of it but at $13 its a little hard. Nevertheless I love this film and will continue to shoot it whenever I get the chance!
I went through a phase of thinking that Acros was too expensive... I tried HP5+, Delta, TMax, Ultrafine....and then went back through all my old images and bought another batch of Acros. There's nothing quite like it. The grain is fine to non-existent, even pushed 2 stops. I love the contrasty look most of all. It loves light, so always err on the side of over-exposure, but as I allude to above it will tolerate under-exposure if you compensate for it in development. Watch dev time/temperature though - it is possible to overcook it in which case it's not much better looking than Delta or TMax. Also - don't bother trying to be cheap and use Rodinal or stand-development, as it'll just bring out the grain. Even with it's slightly finicky need for good light and more ... MoreI went through a phase of thinking that Acros was too expensive... I tried HP5+, Delta, TMax, Ultrafine....and then went back through all my old images and bought another batch of Acros. There's nothing quite like it. The grain is fine to non-existent, even pushed 2 stops. I love the contrasty look most of all. It loves light, so always err on the side of over-exposure, but as I allude to above it will tolerate under-exposure if you compensate for it in development. Watch dev time/temperature though - it is possible to overcook it in which case it's not much better looking than Delta or TMax. Also - don't bother trying to be cheap and use Rodinal or stand-development, as it'll just bring out the grain. Even with it's slightly finicky need for good light and more careful development, it's worth it. I shoot it in 35mm and 120 at 100 or 400 ASA and really haven't seen any better results than with this film. If you want the grain or you want a more forgiving film look elsewhere, but there are plenty of alternatives to fill that role. Acros is Acros, and the second generation is practically identical to the first. Everybody should at least try it, just to see what they're missing.
Shot at box speed this is an excellent all round film. Pushed to 400 this film excels at street photography and moody portraiture. Just take a look at some of the work of Ted Vieira on YouTube. You'll see what I mean. However, it's expensive and needs to be far more readily available.
Fuji Acros is most defiantly my favourite portrait film. It has a smoothness and sparkle to it like no other film I've come a across and is something I always take along with me to a Portrait shoot. It's relatively fine grained but it is there. However, the grain is super pleasing and really shows off a photo is shot on film rather then digital. It is slightly picky when it comes to exposure, but not to the detriment of using the film. The main negative for me is obviously the price point, which is very high compared to Ilford branded film. For me Acros is still worth it though.I cannot recommend this film enough and hope that it's here to stay. Needless to say, if I only shot one film stock, it would be this!
I had been excited to shoot the film for a very long time and when composing my shots tried to envision what the image would look like based off of sample shots I had seen. However, my images looked nothing like it. The contrast is very high, with shadows rendered very dark. I home scanned this roll myself (for the first time) using Negative Lab Pro, but I doubt that the home scan is what has rendered these images so dark.I used this film for an attempted start trail and I was very impressed (any floors in the image are likely light pollution, not the film), but I am uncertain as to whether that alone is enough for me to buy this film again. This is the second ever B+W film I have used, second to HP5+, so I feel I need to experiment more. I want to like this film ... MoreI had been excited to shoot the film for a very long time and when composing my shots tried to envision what the image would look like based off of sample shots I had seen. However, my images looked nothing like it. The contrast is very high, with shadows rendered very dark. I home scanned this roll myself (for the first time) using Negative Lab Pro, but I doubt that the home scan is what has rendered these images so dark.I used this film for an attempted start trail and I was very impressed (any floors in the image are likely light pollution, not the film), but I am uncertain as to whether that alone is enough for me to buy this film again. This is the second ever B+W film I have used, second to HP5+, so I feel I need to experiment more. I want to like this film and have another roll to experiment with, but the super high contrast is a bit much for my taste and, in my opinion, suits street photography more than nature photography.
| Style | Photo Accessories |
