Last updated at 09/21/2025 11:47:43
originally posted on altitude-sports.com
There is a lot to love in this shoe. Out of the box, it’s a fantasti , bright coral. I love a pop of colour, and with darker days ahead I’m always happy to be more visible. On the foot, it’s really lightweight with great cushioning. I am a reliable 8.5 in regular shoes but often find I need to size up at least 1/2 a size in running shoes but I found these fit really well. The tongue wraps around so it’s almost like an inner sock. It fit a bit tight initially but is softening up. Totally recommend this shoe.
originally posted on roadrunnersports.com
Just purchased so these are my initial thoughts. The shoe is softer than I expected but not "mushy" as with other high stacked shoes. Despite the stack height the shoe is stable. Also I have the desire to run faster than expected for a slower pace daily shoe. Personally I don't really notice the weight that I hear people complain about. Bottom line is good shoe for daily training with ability to pick up the pace. I can see this shoe for a half marathon or less without any issues.
originally posted on roadrunnersports.com
I've been wearing the Adizero Boston size 10.5 for about 10 years. I liked them because they were more like sneakers and not the typical running shoe. The new design is a much larger (and weighs more too) shoe which I don't like because I wear a big shoe size.For running, I always wear a half size larger and it works for me. These shoes were also ordered as a 10.5 - my non running shoe size is a 10.
There is a lot to love in this shoe. Out of the box, it’s a fantasti , bright coral. I love a pop of colour, and with darker days ahead I’m always happy to be more visible. On the foot, it’s really lightweight with great cushioning. I am a reliable 8.5 in regular shoes but often find I need to size up at least 1/2 a size in running shoes but I found these fit really well. The tongue wraps around so it’s almost like an inner sock. It fit a bit tight initially but is softening up. Totally recommend this shoe.
Just purchased so these are my initial thoughts. The shoe is softer than I expected but not "mushy" as with other high stacked shoes. Despite the stack height the shoe is stable. Also I have the desire to run faster than expected for a slower pace daily shoe. Personally I don't really notice the weight that I hear people complain about. Bottom line is good shoe for daily training with ability to pick up the pace. I can see this shoe for a half marathon or less without any issues.
I've been wearing the Adizero Boston size 10.5 for about 10 years. I liked them because they were more like sneakers and not the typical running shoe. The new design is a much larger (and weighs more too) shoe which I don't like because I wear a big shoe size.For running, I always wear a half size larger and it works for me. These shoes were also ordered as a 10.5 - my non running shoe size is a 10.
I used to run the Bostons years ago until I ended up with a stress fracture in my foot. I switched to more cushioned shoes after that. When I saw adidas changed the Bostons to be more cushioned, I decided to go back to them, and they are perfect for me when running long distances. My feet don't hurt after 20+ miles. I did have to adjust the lacing to reduce pressure on the top of my foot, but I've had to do that with several shoe brands.
I have run only in Asics for 15 years, but decided to give these a try based on positive reviews for outside distance running. I was not optimistic as these shoes have the sock lining which to me limits the ability to adjust the shoe to best fit my foot. The material was very sharp and rubbed against my shin, by the end of my first run, which was painful, I had red areas on both my shins from the razor-sharp material. Can't move the tongue due to the sock lining, so my options to address my discomfort during my run were limited, wasn't going to run home barefoot but I did think about it for a minute.The shoe itself seems like it might be ok, but I wasn't impressed by this style due to the issues listed. Other shoes I run in are more comfortable but to be fair, I ... MoreI have run only in Asics for 15 years, but decided to give these a try based on positive reviews for outside distance running. I was not optimistic as these shoes have the sock lining which to me limits the ability to adjust the shoe to best fit my foot. The material was very sharp and rubbed against my shin, by the end of my first run, which was painful, I had red areas on both my shins from the razor-sharp material. Can't move the tongue due to the sock lining, so my options to address my discomfort during my run were limited, wasn't going to run home barefoot but I did think about it for a minute.The shoe itself seems like it might be ok, but I wasn't impressed by this style due to the issues listed. Other shoes I run in are more comfortable but to be fair, I could not run in these shoes more than one time.The sole of the shoe is made with continental tire material but not the entire sole, I am concerned that portion of the sole will wear down before the tire sections and alter my gait/foot strike due to uneven wear. I can see this is going to be an issue after one run based on the wear pattern. The continental tire soles do add traction and minimize noise from pounding the pavement, which were both positives.These might be for some to run in long distances, but I could not keep these due to these issues and will be returning them.
Adidas took a chance in so drastically changing a much loved shoe. But I think they did a great job. I purchased these as a daily trainer to augment my Pro 2 shoes for race day (Also bought and reviewed here on Altitude).But first, a bit about me, so you can see if my review would have any value to your needs. I’m 67, 180 pounds, 6’6” and train primarily on roads and race road marathon distances. I’ve been running for over 40 years, and have the gnarly feet to prove it, so appreciate a good shoe.Build;I am always happy to see Continental rubber on an outsole, as it wears so well. There is good tread and grip on the Bostons as befits a daily trainer. (And yes, I see in the picture I managed to step in fox poop in both shoes. That’s life in rural PEI.) The uppers ... MoreAdidas took a chance in so drastically changing a much loved shoe. But I think they did a great job. I purchased these as a daily trainer to augment my Pro 2 shoes for race day (Also bought and reviewed here on Altitude).But first, a bit about me, so you can see if my review would have any value to your needs. I’m 67, 180 pounds, 6’6” and train primarily on roads and race road marathon distances. I’ve been running for over 40 years, and have the gnarly feet to prove it, so appreciate a good shoe.Build;I am always happy to see Continental rubber on an outsole, as it wears so well. There is good tread and grip on the Bostons as befits a daily trainer. (And yes, I see in the picture I managed to step in fox poop in both shoes. That’s life in rural PEI.) The uppers are not as breathable as I had expected, and my feet were hotter than some of my other shoes. But the uppers do lock your foot in, and the toe box is spacious. Some reviewers have remarked that these shoes are heavy, but I think we runners are getting obsessed with the weight of our watches and shoes and in danger of becoming weight weenies like our cyclist friends. :-) Size 13 Boston 10 is 12.5oz/353g, the Pro2 is 10oz/283g. I’m not that fine tuned a runner to be affected by three ounces.Ride;The fibreglass rods are noticeable, and in conjunction with the Lightstrike foam, the energy return is obvious. I found I was pushing more watts and speed without an increase in heart rate. I know the Stryd power pod reacts differently to different shoes, and I had no way to test how accurate the higher wattage was, except to correlate it to heart rate.While these are more stable than the Pro2, as they don’t have the drastic heel taper, these shoes are best suited to forefoot strikers. I’m a forefoot striker and found the shoe had a nice pop and toe off. When I tried heel striking, I was surprised how hard the padding seemed and how jarring the transition was. The heel padding is not as soft as you would think by looking at it. And after a few runs on clay roads, I think this is a shoe best used on pavement.The energy return system works best at high tempo training speed, though is more responsive than the Pro 2, which really only shines at race pace. I would compare it with the Hoka Carbon X’s response.Sizing;I usually run in a size 13 in Adidas and, in spite of some comments on the web, found 13 fit perfectly. The toe box is quite wide for an Adidas shoe.Conclusion:I am impressed with the Boston 10, especially at the price. They pair with the Pro 2 very well, and seem an ideal symbiotic rotation. And the red/blue colours remind me of my Adidas sneakers from the 70s.
Bought as a replacement for Adizero 11's for a bargain price, and they are great.Light, comfortable ( even after 3.5hrs ), very secure hold, good response when you need some pace.The old 11's were great, even after 800km usage, still earlier days but these might be better, they look great too.
I've been buying and wearing Adidas running shoes for a long time, mainly because the Adidas last fits my feet well. Unusually and unpleasantly, both sides of the tongue on this shoe is attached back to the heel with a strap. Although the strap is elastic, it does not stretch much, making the shoe very difficult and uncomfortable to put on and take off, the former especially. I recommend you not buy this model if you have large feet, as do I.
Purchased these out of curiosity more than anything. Havent bought them since the Boston 3. Took them out for a test run thinking I'd turn around when my toes went numb (as all new shoes do)... ended up running out of time instead, 17km first run, 28km second run. No hot spots, no numbness. Brilliant! Thanks Adidas for making proper running shoes again.
Worst running shoe I've ever had. Wore them around to break them in for a few hours. First run was 10km easy and they became more and more uncomfortable in the arch. When I took them off I could swear I had plantar fasciitis. I'm not sure if the plastic rods extend to the heals or if they push up on the arch? Much prefer Hoka Carbon X. I'd guess anything with a plate is going to work better than rods.
