The Kodak Gold/Ultramax 400 135 is a color negative film that is also suitable for low-light situations. It offers an amazing combination of rich colors and high sharpness. Even when enlarged, the images remain sharp, fine-grained, and very bright. The professional color reproduction technology of this film ensures bright and vibrant colors with precise rendering of skin tones.
The Kodak Gold/Ultramax 400 135 is a color negative film that is also suitable for low-light situations. It offers an amazing combination of rich colors and high sharpness. Even when enlarged, the images remain sharp, fine-grained, and very bright. The professional color reproduction technology of this film ensures bright and vibrant colors with precise rendering of skin tones.
The Kodak Gold/Ultramax 400 135 is a color negative film that is also suitable for low-light situations. It offers an amazing combination of rich colors and high sharpness. Even when enlarged, the images remain sharp, fine-grained, and very bright. The professional color reproduction technology of this film ensures bright and vibrant colors with precise rendering of skin tones.
The Kodak Gold/Ultramax 400 135 is a color negative film that is also suitable for low-light situations. It offers an amazing combination of rich colors and high sharpness. Even when enlarged, the images remain sharp, fine-grained, and very bright. The professional color reproduction technology of this film ensures bright and vibrant colors with precise rendering of skin tones.
Last updated at 06/09/2026 20:41:40
Kodak Gold Ultra 400 135-24 CN Film
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Kodak Ultra Max 400 135-24
Delivery $40.79
Kodak Ultramax 400 135/24 - (pack From 1) (expired Naturally)
Delivery $27.29
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
originally posted on analoguewonderland.co.uk
This is the best go to film for every day. Works adequately in all lighting conditions and just a really good, reliable all round film. If you are using a roll in your camera for a few different occasions and not one dedicated shoot then I can’t think of a better film to keep in your camera for variable conditions, especially for the price. I have probably bought more of this than any other film.
originally posted on analoguewonderland.co.uk
This film is colourful and contrasty without being 'too much'. More punchy than Kodak Portra and better in shadier conditions. The photographs I uploaded were all shot in spring in the Peak District where I live on an Olympus OM20 and an Olympus Trip 35.A good balance and, at ISO 400, good for a mixture of light conditions.
originally posted on analoguewonderland.co.uk
I’ve just started using film again after a long gap.25 years ago I invariably used 400 film - I’ve never liked flash and it was great for doing low light shadowy and indoor shots. So when I bought a 60 year old Agfa Super Silette on EBay I used a 400 film to test it without really thinking it through. I also had to use a light meter, something I’ve never had to do with any of the cameras I’ve used in the past. Inevitably I made a lot of mistakes.Anyway, all wasn’t lost. I’ve proved the camera works well (I’m not convinced about the light meter which appears to have died now). Where I got it right (for me) the colours were spot on and I was really pleased with the results.I do like my woodland shots taken into the sun. This is achievable with this film if you’re ... MoreI’ve just started using film again after a long gap.25 years ago I invariably used 400 film - I’ve never liked flash and it was great for doing low light shadowy and indoor shots. So when I bought a 60 year old Agfa Super Silette on EBay I used a 400 film to test it without really thinking it through. I also had to use a light meter, something I’ve never had to do with any of the cameras I’ve used in the past. Inevitably I made a lot of mistakes.Anyway, all wasn’t lost. I’ve proved the camera works well (I’m not convinced about the light meter which appears to have died now). Where I got it right (for me) the colours were spot on and I was really pleased with the results.I do like my woodland shots taken into the sun. This is achievable with this film if you’re careful breaking the rules. It’s really great for high contrast between shadow and light and indoor natural light.I will definitely use Ultramax again but probably a 100 or 200 next time with this camera. 400 will remain my default on my more versatile SLRs.
| Body Disp. Cam | Standard |
| Disposable Camera Lens | without Lens |
| Film Format | 135 mm |
| Number of exposures | 24 |
| Pack Size | 1 |
Kodak Gold Ultra 400 135-24 CN Film
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Kodak Ultra Max 400 135-24
Delivery $40.79
Kodak Ultramax 400 135/24 - (pack From 1) (expired Naturally)
Delivery $27.29
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
This is the best go to film for every day. Works adequately in all lighting conditions and just a really good, reliable all round film. If you are using a roll in your camera for a few different occasions and not one dedicated shoot then I can’t think of a better film to keep in your camera for variable conditions, especially for the price. I have probably bought more of this than any other film.
This film is colourful and contrasty without being 'too much'. More punchy than Kodak Portra and better in shadier conditions. The photographs I uploaded were all shot in spring in the Peak District where I live on an Olympus OM20 and an Olympus Trip 35.A good balance and, at ISO 400, good for a mixture of light conditions.
I’ve just started using film again after a long gap.25 years ago I invariably used 400 film - I’ve never liked flash and it was great for doing low light shadowy and indoor shots. So when I bought a 60 year old Agfa Super Silette on EBay I used a 400 film to test it without really thinking it through. I also had to use a light meter, something I’ve never had to do with any of the cameras I’ve used in the past. Inevitably I made a lot of mistakes.Anyway, all wasn’t lost. I’ve proved the camera works well (I’m not convinced about the light meter which appears to have died now). Where I got it right (for me) the colours were spot on and I was really pleased with the results.I do like my woodland shots taken into the sun. This is achievable with this film if you’re ... MoreI’ve just started using film again after a long gap.25 years ago I invariably used 400 film - I’ve never liked flash and it was great for doing low light shadowy and indoor shots. So when I bought a 60 year old Agfa Super Silette on EBay I used a 400 film to test it without really thinking it through. I also had to use a light meter, something I’ve never had to do with any of the cameras I’ve used in the past. Inevitably I made a lot of mistakes.Anyway, all wasn’t lost. I’ve proved the camera works well (I’m not convinced about the light meter which appears to have died now). Where I got it right (for me) the colours were spot on and I was really pleased with the results.I do like my woodland shots taken into the sun. This is achievable with this film if you’re careful breaking the rules. It’s really great for high contrast between shadow and light and indoor natural light.I will definitely use Ultramax again but probably a 100 or 200 next time with this camera. 400 will remain my default on my more versatile SLRs.
Loved using the H35N and Ultramax, some of the pictures from the first roll through the camera. First time also using Ultramax, colours are great, used an ND4 when at the beach in very bright sun but not really needed as shot the same scene without the ND, ND2 and ND4. Lab pulled images from all of the shots with little to no difference between them. First roll of film I have used in years. Lots of fun....
It's kodak so it's got good colours. I prefer shooting this to portra because it's cheaper and so I don't end up overthinking it. It's 400 so it's suited to British weather is my figuring on it. I think I've accidentally shot at 200 and 100 and still got okay frames, so it's forgiving. It's a great, forgiving film for beginners and learning. I'd use it anywhere for anything if I could, I'm guessing it's just Gold 400 rebadged but I don't know. I've always leaned towards 400.
This is a solid performer that is a great all-rounder. Not as vibrant and contrasty as Ektar, but more forgiving, and not as fine-grained or accuate as Portra, but cheaper, and not as classically "analog" as the motion-picture stock based emulsions like Cinestill 400D, but still a great film look.I've used Ultramax for nature and landscapes for years, but more recently have turned to it for portraits and fashion work, especially when I've needed a pop of color. It's an economical option for a lot of genres. The choice between this and Fuji 400 for some comes down to price, but for me it's about the tones and color palette and it's something I tend to keep on hand, just in case.
Generally use Gold as my go to day to day (for price & colour. Shot a roll of Ultramax 400 in foggy / misty conditions- happy results.Picked up the oranges / greens a little more cooler than eye or iPhone 15 ProMax (which we know over saturated).Very happy - got a few rolls of this and Gold 200 for next week in Ghent, Bruges,Brussels & Lille.Shot at box, Nikon F100, F8 @Trefil South Wales.
I have used Kodak Ultramax a number of times now and it has become one of my favourite film stocks. The price point is more affordable than the Portra range and I love the colours. It is very useful when light levels are less than ideal. I have successfully used it at a number of vintage tractor events and been very impressed. It is an extremely useful all round film which I will continue to use.
I always think of Ultramax as the big brother of ColorPlus. It's quite saturated and contrasty, which means I don't always love having it in my main camera. I think it's a good film to have in a point & shoot because ISO 400 is so versatile.The dynamic range isn't very forgiving, and in my experience it doesn't do very well when pushed - the grain is too pronounced, the shadows are murky and any colour cast gets even stronger (see my winterscape photo).What I do like about it is the way it renders blues - Gold is my favourite stock, but I never like how the sky comes out when shooting it. Ultramax on the other hand, I'm happy using it into blue hour because of the higher ISO and the way the colder tones look.
Honestly, it bores me, but I try to keep a few rolls of Ultramax on hand at all times. I shot so much of this decades ago that it's just sort of what I think of as a default color film. It's utterly predictable, with satisfying color and a solid exposure latitude that can make up for most mistakes I make.It's the film version of water. It's what I reach for when I want something but I'm not sure what.I've also discovered that its saturation, grain, and contrast when pushed two stops are utterly magic. It's a nice trick to keep in my back pocket.
| Body Disp. Cam | Standard |
| Disposable Camera Lens | without Lens |
| Film Format | 135 mm |
| Number of exposures | 24 |
| Pack Size | 1 |
