Kodak Pro Image 100 is a medium-speed color negative film offering high color saturation along with realistic color balance and accurate skin tone rendering, making it well suited for portraiture and social applications. This film has a nominal sensitivity of ISO 100/21°, however, its wide exposure latitude makes it especially suitable for underexposure. Additionally, this unique film is intended for storage at room temperature and also has excellent latent image-keeping characteristics, allowing for longer time periods between exposure and development while maintaining acceptable results. This item is five rolls of 36-exposure 35mm roll film.
Kodak Pro Image 100 is a medium-speed color negative film offering high color saturation along with realistic color balance and accurate skin tone rendering, making it well suited for portraiture and social applications. This film has a nominal sensitivity of ISO 100/21°, however, its wide exposure latitude makes it especially suitable for underexposure. Additionally, this unique film is intended for storage at room temperature and also has excellent latent image-keeping characteristics, allowing for longer time periods between exposure and development while maintaining acceptable results. This item is five rolls of 36-exposure 35mm roll film.
Kodak Pro Image 100 is a medium-speed color negative film offering high color saturation along with realistic color balance and accurate skin tone rendering, making it well suited for portraiture and social applications. This film has a nominal sensitivity of ISO 100/21°, however, its wide exposure latitude makes it especially suitable for underexposure. Additionally, this unique film is intended for storage at room temperature and also has excellent latent image-keeping characteristics, allowing for longer time periods between exposure and development while maintaining acceptable results. This item is five rolls of 36-exposure 35mm roll film.
Kodak Pro Image 100 is a medium-speed color negative film offering high color saturation along with realistic color balance and accurate skin tone rendering, making it well suited for portraiture and social applications. This film has a nominal sensitivity of ISO 100/21°, however, its wide exposure latitude makes it especially suitable for underexposure. Additionally, this unique film is intended for storage at room temperature and also has excellent latent image-keeping characteristics, allowing for longer time periods between exposure and development while maintaining acceptable results. This item is five rolls of 36-exposure 35mm roll film.
Last updated at 06/10/2026 10:34:15
Kodak Ektar 100 Professional ISO 100, 35mm, 36 Exposures, Colour Negative Film 2-Pack
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Kodak Professional Pro Image 100 - 36exp, 135/35mm Color Negative Film (Single Roll)
Delivery $12.43
Kodak Pro Image 100 (35mm) 36 Exp. EXPIRED 12/2025
Delivery $59
Kodak Pro Image 100 35mm
Delivery $10
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Kodak Pro Image 100 Colour Negative Film (35mm)
Delivery $9.50
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
5 Rolls Kodak Pro Image 100 Professional 35mm Film 6034466 Expires
Delivery $37.78
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Kodak Pro Image 100 Color Negative 35mm Film, 36 Exposures, 5 Rolls
Delivery $26.62
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Kodak Film Pro Image 100 Color Film (35mm 36 Exposures, 5-pack)
Free delivery
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Kodak Pro Image 100 Color Negative Film (35mm Roll Film, 36 Exposures,
Free delivery
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Kodak Pro Image 100 35mm
Delivery between 11–19 June $9.70
originally posted on analoguewonderland.co.uk
I shot my first roll of Pro Image while back home in Cornwall. It's a gorgeous film when shot right. I think it looks more premium than Kodak Gold, but is more affordable than something like Portra. I like how the tones are quite muted; this isn't a film if you like punchy contrasts and vivid colours, more of a soft, gentle and cosy film. Using it in the evening on a beach was pretty much a perfect scenario for it. I shot these pictures on a Chinon CM-4s with 28mm Miranda lens.Overall, a solid, premium-feel film that I have bought more rolls of since shooting it for the first time.
originally posted on bhphotovideo.com
Disclaimer, I self develop, scan, and edit my pictures. Was pleasantly surprised by this film. It was honestly sitting around for a while since I mainly use portra, or some other film I’m experimenting with. Finally took this on a hiking trip, and loved the results. Will definitely consider buying again. Top notch stuff. Great for broad daylight.
originally posted on analoguewonderland.co.uk
In terms of pricing, Kodak Pro Image 100 seems to occupy a position between the consumer Kodak films (ColorPlus, Gold) and the Professional line (Portra, Ektar etc.). From my experience, I'd say that the performance lies between these two categories as well.The colours are nicely saturated, but arguably lack the delicate tonal rendition of higher grade films; to my eye, it seems more on the consumer end of the spectrum in this sense. It does have the pleasing warmth of Gold, and so fits well into the "summer holiday" aesthetic, if that's what you're going for.In terms of grain, I find it to be on the heavier/more noticeable side for a 100 speed film. Perhaps my perspective has been warped by the remarkable performance of Ektar, but I was surprised to see how ... MoreIn terms of pricing, Kodak Pro Image 100 seems to occupy a position between the consumer Kodak films (ColorPlus, Gold) and the Professional line (Portra, Ektar etc.). From my experience, I'd say that the performance lies between these two categories as well.The colours are nicely saturated, but arguably lack the delicate tonal rendition of higher grade films; to my eye, it seems more on the consumer end of the spectrum in this sense. It does have the pleasing warmth of Gold, and so fits well into the "summer holiday" aesthetic, if that's what you're going for.In terms of grain, I find it to be on the heavier/more noticeable side for a 100 speed film. Perhaps my perspective has been warped by the remarkable performance of Ektar, but I was surprised to see how evident the grain was at this ISO. Again, this may fit in very well if you're aiming for that particular look, but it may limit the general purpose usefulness of the film. I'd say that it's a bit too intrusive for landscapes, as it obscures some of the fine detail at large reproductions; Ektar presents a far better colour negative option for this purpose, at the same speed.The latitude seems less broad that its more pricey counterparts as well. I don't know whether it didn't benefit from the technological advances translated from the Vision3 cine films that so improved Portra, but it certainly feels that way. I found that I more readily lost highlight detail than I would using Portra 160, and so again it seems closer to Gold in this sense.I've seen it reported that the film is very robust, being able to tolerate higher temperatures for longer than other films. I didn't subject my rolls to such conditions, so I can't really comment on this, but it may present an advantage for travel if this is the case.I'm certainly not against any of the particular aspects described above; I think that the Gold aesthetic is wonderful for certain uses, and gives a very nostalgic feeling to images. However, I fear that Pro Image 100 loses out by falling in between the two price brackets. There seems to be a bigger step up in quality from this to Portra, than from Gold to this. If absolute quality is the aim, then there are certainly better choices for a bit more money. However, if you want the nostalgic Gold look, why not just shoot Gold?
| Speed | 160 ISO |
| Compatible Cameras | 35mm film cameras |
| Exposures | 36 Exposures |
Kodak Ektar 100 Professional ISO 100, 35mm, 36 Exposures, Colour Negative Film 2-Pack
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Kodak Professional Pro Image 100 - 36exp, 135/35mm Color Negative Film (Single Roll)
Delivery $12.43
Kodak Pro Image 100 (35mm) 36 Exp. EXPIRED 12/2025
Delivery $59
Kodak Pro Image 100 35mm
Delivery $10
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Kodak Pro Image 100 Colour Negative Film (35mm)
Delivery $9.50
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
I shot my first roll of Pro Image while back home in Cornwall. It's a gorgeous film when shot right. I think it looks more premium than Kodak Gold, but is more affordable than something like Portra. I like how the tones are quite muted; this isn't a film if you like punchy contrasts and vivid colours, more of a soft, gentle and cosy film. Using it in the evening on a beach was pretty much a perfect scenario for it. I shot these pictures on a Chinon CM-4s with 28mm Miranda lens.Overall, a solid, premium-feel film that I have bought more rolls of since shooting it for the first time.
Disclaimer, I self develop, scan, and edit my pictures. Was pleasantly surprised by this film. It was honestly sitting around for a while since I mainly use portra, or some other film I’m experimenting with. Finally took this on a hiking trip, and loved the results. Will definitely consider buying again. Top notch stuff. Great for broad daylight.
In terms of pricing, Kodak Pro Image 100 seems to occupy a position between the consumer Kodak films (ColorPlus, Gold) and the Professional line (Portra, Ektar etc.). From my experience, I'd say that the performance lies between these two categories as well.The colours are nicely saturated, but arguably lack the delicate tonal rendition of higher grade films; to my eye, it seems more on the consumer end of the spectrum in this sense. It does have the pleasing warmth of Gold, and so fits well into the "summer holiday" aesthetic, if that's what you're going for.In terms of grain, I find it to be on the heavier/more noticeable side for a 100 speed film. Perhaps my perspective has been warped by the remarkable performance of Ektar, but I was surprised to see how ... MoreIn terms of pricing, Kodak Pro Image 100 seems to occupy a position between the consumer Kodak films (ColorPlus, Gold) and the Professional line (Portra, Ektar etc.). From my experience, I'd say that the performance lies between these two categories as well.The colours are nicely saturated, but arguably lack the delicate tonal rendition of higher grade films; to my eye, it seems more on the consumer end of the spectrum in this sense. It does have the pleasing warmth of Gold, and so fits well into the "summer holiday" aesthetic, if that's what you're going for.In terms of grain, I find it to be on the heavier/more noticeable side for a 100 speed film. Perhaps my perspective has been warped by the remarkable performance of Ektar, but I was surprised to see how evident the grain was at this ISO. Again, this may fit in very well if you're aiming for that particular look, but it may limit the general purpose usefulness of the film. I'd say that it's a bit too intrusive for landscapes, as it obscures some of the fine detail at large reproductions; Ektar presents a far better colour negative option for this purpose, at the same speed.The latitude seems less broad that its more pricey counterparts as well. I don't know whether it didn't benefit from the technological advances translated from the Vision3 cine films that so improved Portra, but it certainly feels that way. I found that I more readily lost highlight detail than I would using Portra 160, and so again it seems closer to Gold in this sense.I've seen it reported that the film is very robust, being able to tolerate higher temperatures for longer than other films. I didn't subject my rolls to such conditions, so I can't really comment on this, but it may present an advantage for travel if this is the case.I'm certainly not against any of the particular aspects described above; I think that the Gold aesthetic is wonderful for certain uses, and gives a very nostalgic feeling to images. However, I fear that Pro Image 100 loses out by falling in between the two price brackets. There seems to be a bigger step up in quality from this to Portra, than from Gold to this. If absolute quality is the aim, then there are certainly better choices for a bit more money. However, if you want the nostalgic Gold look, why not just shoot Gold?
As a first-time user of Kodak Pro Image 100, I’m frankly impressed. The colours are warm and natural, giving the images a pleasant vintage feel. Skin tones come out smooth, making it great for portraits. It’s not overly grainy, but it still has that classic film texture.Even in bright conditions, it handled highlights and shadows well. While it’s more budget-friendly compared to other Kodak films, it doesn’t compromise on quality.Overall, a great option for those looking to experiment with film without breaking the bank!
It's not just cheap, it's an amazing looking film stock. It's neither Ektar nor Portra, but it's somewhere in the middle between the two, and reliably so. Perfect for summertime street photography. Make sure you meter correctly, because it doesn't handle overexposure as well as other Kodak films, but the results are so choice they border on primo.Unless I was doing a serious gig for a serious client paying serious bucks, I'd grab five rolls of ProImage100 over 2-and-half Portra160s any day.Geez, I wish it came in 400 though.
Shot my first roll of this on a grey December day using a Zeiss Icon Contaflex Super, relying on it's (ancient and quirky) metering system, so exposures were "probably within a stop or so".There's plenty of sharpness, with just enough smooth grain to say "this ain't digital" and natural rendition of the colours from the dull day without looking washed out. The one splash of red when the car passed suggests that it would cope equally well with more vibrant scenes and I look forward to trying it on something less rural when I have the chance!I was a little concerned that the 100 speed would be restrictive, but that was just the voice in my head that's got used to "faster is better" talking. For years most of us used to shoot 100 as the "standard" speed in 35mm, ... MoreShot my first roll of this on a grey December day using a Zeiss Icon Contaflex Super, relying on it's (ancient and quirky) metering system, so exposures were "probably within a stop or so".There's plenty of sharpness, with just enough smooth grain to say "this ain't digital" and natural rendition of the colours from the dull day without looking washed out. The one splash of red when the car passed suggests that it would cope equally well with more vibrant scenes and I look forward to trying it on something less rural when I have the chance!I was a little concerned that the 100 speed would be restrictive, but that was just the voice in my head that's got used to "faster is better" talking. For years most of us used to shoot 100 as the "standard" speed in 35mm, 200 was impressive and 400 was "wow!". Light, film, and chemistry haven't changed, only our expectations. Don't let "a bit slow" put you offPossibly not one for people who like technicolour dreams but, if you like your memories to match what was actually there at the time, this film is certainly worth trying out. My list of "well suited for" probably isn't complete. I can only judge by what I've shot so far with it and the overall impression of ease of use, but suspect it would be competent for pretty much anything except low light.Shot at box speed and developed in Cinestill C41 chemistry, the results were easy to scan - examples have nothing done in post .
First impressions: the color palette comes off slightly stark with a narrow dynamic range; noticeable especially with skin tones and what appears to be an emphasis on greens. It is certainly not Kodak's Portra or Gold, reminding me more of Fujifilm in its coolness. That said, if ProImage had been available when I spent two years in tropical Asia, I would have chosen it for routine use. The room temp/humidity stability and price are quite attractive.Not yet certain I will buy another ten rolls, but I will continue to shoot this film until I better understand it.
I bought a brick of this during the pandemic along with Fuji C200, and thought it might offer an alternative to those cool tones. However, I reckon Kodak Pro Image 100 is a subtle film, with muted tones and moderate contrast. It does not like underexposure at all, and your pictures could end up very muddy. I prefer punchier films, and this is not one of them. The ISO 100 speed makes using it limited to daylight or sunny weather. In my examples it was overcast (in Manchester, shocker...) and the results are a bit grainier and on the edge of being underexposed. I would probably recommend rating at EI50 if you can, and give this film more light so you stand a chance of less grain. Overall it's not my style, but could be suited to others if you prefer its look.Example ... MoreI bought a brick of this during the pandemic along with Fuji C200, and thought it might offer an alternative to those cool tones. However, I reckon Kodak Pro Image 100 is a subtle film, with muted tones and moderate contrast. It does not like underexposure at all, and your pictures could end up very muddy. I prefer punchier films, and this is not one of them. The ISO 100 speed makes using it limited to daylight or sunny weather. In my examples it was overcast (in Manchester, shocker...) and the results are a bit grainier and on the edge of being underexposed. I would probably recommend rating at EI50 if you can, and give this film more light so you stand a chance of less grain. Overall it's not my style, but could be suited to others if you prefer its look.Example images taken on Minolta 7000i at EI100.
This might, in a few rolls, have become my favorite 35mm film. So please don't buy it; I want it all for myself.I don't shoot 35mm much, but I love the way this film renders. For 35mm-size negatives, I'd put this up against Kodak's WAY WAY WAY more expensive stocks.The film backing material is pretty thin and curls, so scanning is a little bit more a pain than with those other stocks; but seriously, if the difference for me is the convenience of scanning? It's no contest.
Really nice, natural colours. Reds are very punchy, vibrancy is greater than Gold or ColorPlus, but not as high as Ektar. Slow speed, so I got more blurred shots than I did with ColorPlus or Gold in the same camera, especially when using it to take photos of people. Shots with a full rainbow of colours really showed off the colour reproduction of it though. It also survived being x-rayed 3 times without any visible degradation! A such, if you're going somewhere sunny, it's a decent pick, just make sure you can get that shutter speed up! Shots were on my Olympus Pen-EE half-frame camera and it worked well, even with the reduced resolution.
| Speed | 160 ISO |
| Compatible Cameras | 35mm film cameras |
| Exposures | 36 Exposures |
