The Timberland logo itself is a branchy tree on a field, and since Timberland means “land that is covered with trees and shrubs”, it is only fitting to have a tree as its logo. A sturdy-looking tree that perfectly matches a shoe made for the rugged terrain.
The Timberland logo itself is a branchy tree on a field, and since Timberland means “land that is covered with trees and shrubs”, it is only fitting to have a tree as its logo. A sturdy-looking tree that perfectly matches a shoe made for the rugged terrain.
The Timberland logo itself is a branchy tree on a field, and since Timberland means “land that is covered with trees and shrubs”, it is only fitting to have a tree as its logo. A sturdy-looking tree that perfectly matches a shoe made for the rugged terrain.
The Timberland logo itself is a branchy tree on a field, and since Timberland means “land that is covered with trees and shrubs”, it is only fitting to have a tree as its logo. A sturdy-looking tree that perfectly matches a shoe made for the rugged terrain.
Last updated at 03/21/2026 06:20:51
Timberland Mt. Maddsen Mid Hiker 'Dark Brown' | Men's Size 10.5
Delivery between 22–29 Mar $25
originally posted on REI
I bought these just before a winter weekend trip to Quebec City, typically walking 6-10mile a day. Wore them 5 days solidly from dusk to dawn in park snow, urban slush, city streets and upscale restaurants. Was really impressed by mix of support and cushioning, by how light/nimble they were. They were warm and watertight when outside, without being too hot and restrictive inside. Decent size toe box gave me room to wriggle, but there was little in boot slippage when on the steeps, either up or down. Only issue was on first few days the top of the boot color was rubbing on parts of my ankle and calk that don't see that to often: some light pressure bruising, but a) no blisters and b) effect seems to be stabilizing after a week of breaking boots (and my office worker ... MoreI bought these just before a winter weekend trip to Quebec City, typically walking 6-10mile a day. Wore them 5 days solidly from dusk to dawn in park snow, urban slush, city streets and upscale restaurants. Was really impressed by mix of support and cushioning, by how light/nimble they were. They were warm and watertight when outside, without being too hot and restrictive inside. Decent size toe box gave me room to wriggle, but there was little in boot slippage when on the steeps, either up or down. Only issue was on first few days the top of the boot color was rubbing on parts of my ankle and calk that don't see that to often: some light pressure bruising, but a) no blisters and b) effect seems to be stabilizing after a week of breaking boots (and my office worker feet/legs) in!
originally posted on REI
I've been wearing my Timberlands for about 6 months now. I'd just come off a pair of hunting/hiking boots that had lasted four straight years of wear nearly every day in every season—only to find the company went out of business. Understandably, I was skeptical of any other new shoe option. I wanted hikers that had a relaxed, leather-like appearance that could go along with anything in nearly every environment whether I was hiking 14ers or running around in my day job in restaurant management. I also have a condition called plantar fasciitis, which means I HAVE to have good support. Quite a bit of criterion for a single pair of boots to meet.So what about these shoes then? Like my last boots, these have been worn almost every single day. I have taken them ... MoreI've been wearing my Timberlands for about 6 months now. I'd just come off a pair of hunting/hiking boots that had lasted four straight years of wear nearly every day in every season—only to find the company went out of business. Understandably, I was skeptical of any other new shoe option. I wanted hikers that had a relaxed, leather-like appearance that could go along with anything in nearly every environment whether I was hiking 14ers or running around in my day job in restaurant management. I also have a condition called plantar fasciitis, which means I HAVE to have good support. Quite a bit of criterion for a single pair of boots to meet.So what about these shoes then? Like my last boots, these have been worn almost every single day. I have taken them mountain/trail hiking on both groomed trails and trails packed with ice, dogsledding in the dead of winter, trudging through rain, and have worn them for 12hr long shifts of constant movement. My consensus is that they make for excellent, flexible (once broken-in), supportive workboots and they are suitable for groomed and light to moderately rocky trails, but I would not choose these for a technical trail or climb.A few notes on concerns from other reviews when I first considered purchasing these:1. Yes, there is a brass eyelet on the inside of the front ankle and it definitely rubbed at first, but after a week or two of wear, they never bothered me again. Just needed breaking-in.2. These boots are waterproof. I have not had any issues with puddles or rain (so long as water doesn't get in through the top obv) and the shoe soles and tread have held up well. The small rubber tab up near the front of the toe has started to separate from the boot, but it has not affected the waterproof quality at all. I have dumped buckets worth of water on my feet and they have stayed dry.3. They are insulated, but not to the degree of a winter boot. I have worn them in snow and that is just fine, but after a while it does start to get cold around the toes. Insulated but the Gore-tex isn't on par with real, winter insulated boots, but that is to be expected if you want to be wearing these all summer long.4. As someone with an inconvenient foot condition requiring specific insoles in all shoes, these both have the space and the support to accommodate orthopedic inserts (unlike the Oboz I tried a few years back).5. They scuff pretty easily but hiking boots aren't meant to be pretty and cute. If you're gonna wear these daily, they're gonna look like you actually live life.All in all, I have been impressed with this shoe and all that I have put it through in just a few months. So far it has performed as expected, especially as a work boot. I would definitely take these on a well-maintained trail, on day hikes of one or two day overnights in the backcountry, but for particularly technical or intense hikes maybe look for a more expensive shoe.
originally posted on REI
I thought this boot was good looking in the store. A more classic look than all the rest. But the real shock was the price and value. I pay 50% more for trail running shoes. I purchased 11.5 in wide. The reason I wanted this type of boot was it is waterproof and slightly sturdier than my trail running shoes. The sole is a nice middle between the trail shoe and traditional Vibram soles on more expensive boots which can be much stiffer. I was going to be in mixed weather as well as home in CA so being a mid height boot that's relatively light was the right move. Because I've had toe surgery and some metatarsal issues, I added another insole with some arch support as well as a 1/4" meta pad. The wide option allowed me to customize the fit to suit. The last 2 weeks have ... MoreI thought this boot was good looking in the store. A more classic look than all the rest. But the real shock was the price and value. I pay 50% more for trail running shoes. I purchased 11.5 in wide. The reason I wanted this type of boot was it is waterproof and slightly sturdier than my trail running shoes. The sole is a nice middle between the trail shoe and traditional Vibram soles on more expensive boots which can be much stiffer. I was going to be in mixed weather as well as home in CA so being a mid height boot that's relatively light was the right move. Because I've had toe surgery and some metatarsal issues, I added another insole with some arch support as well as a 1/4" meta pad. The wide option allowed me to customize the fit to suit. The last 2 weeks have been hiking in the Wind River Range, the Big Horns and in Silverton. All my hiking was with just a day pack so not much weight but 10-17 miles a day. No issues whatsoever. No material defects and good traction, wet and dry terrain. Well maybe one. The long laces. I either double knot, or loop a second time the upper hooks. I do plan to get some shorter laces.
| Product Dimensions | |
| Length | 14.13 in |
| Height | 5.15 in |
| Width | 10.27 in |
Timberland Mt. Maddsen Mid Hiker 'Dark Brown' | Men's Size 10.5
Delivery between 22–29 Mar $25
I bought these just before a winter weekend trip to Quebec City, typically walking 6-10mile a day. Wore them 5 days solidly from dusk to dawn in park snow, urban slush, city streets and upscale restaurants. Was really impressed by mix of support and cushioning, by how light/nimble they were. They were warm and watertight when outside, without being too hot and restrictive inside. Decent size toe box gave me room to wriggle, but there was little in boot slippage when on the steeps, either up or down. Only issue was on first few days the top of the boot color was rubbing on parts of my ankle and calk that don't see that to often: some light pressure bruising, but a) no blisters and b) effect seems to be stabilizing after a week of breaking boots (and my office worker ... MoreI bought these just before a winter weekend trip to Quebec City, typically walking 6-10mile a day. Wore them 5 days solidly from dusk to dawn in park snow, urban slush, city streets and upscale restaurants. Was really impressed by mix of support and cushioning, by how light/nimble they were. They were warm and watertight when outside, without being too hot and restrictive inside. Decent size toe box gave me room to wriggle, but there was little in boot slippage when on the steeps, either up or down. Only issue was on first few days the top of the boot color was rubbing on parts of my ankle and calk that don't see that to often: some light pressure bruising, but a) no blisters and b) effect seems to be stabilizing after a week of breaking boots (and my office worker feet/legs) in!
I've been wearing my Timberlands for about 6 months now. I'd just come off a pair of hunting/hiking boots that had lasted four straight years of wear nearly every day in every season—only to find the company went out of business. Understandably, I was skeptical of any other new shoe option. I wanted hikers that had a relaxed, leather-like appearance that could go along with anything in nearly every environment whether I was hiking 14ers or running around in my day job in restaurant management. I also have a condition called plantar fasciitis, which means I HAVE to have good support. Quite a bit of criterion for a single pair of boots to meet.So what about these shoes then? Like my last boots, these have been worn almost every single day. I have taken them ... MoreI've been wearing my Timberlands for about 6 months now. I'd just come off a pair of hunting/hiking boots that had lasted four straight years of wear nearly every day in every season—only to find the company went out of business. Understandably, I was skeptical of any other new shoe option. I wanted hikers that had a relaxed, leather-like appearance that could go along with anything in nearly every environment whether I was hiking 14ers or running around in my day job in restaurant management. I also have a condition called plantar fasciitis, which means I HAVE to have good support. Quite a bit of criterion for a single pair of boots to meet.So what about these shoes then? Like my last boots, these have been worn almost every single day. I have taken them mountain/trail hiking on both groomed trails and trails packed with ice, dogsledding in the dead of winter, trudging through rain, and have worn them for 12hr long shifts of constant movement. My consensus is that they make for excellent, flexible (once broken-in), supportive workboots and they are suitable for groomed and light to moderately rocky trails, but I would not choose these for a technical trail or climb.A few notes on concerns from other reviews when I first considered purchasing these:1. Yes, there is a brass eyelet on the inside of the front ankle and it definitely rubbed at first, but after a week or two of wear, they never bothered me again. Just needed breaking-in.2. These boots are waterproof. I have not had any issues with puddles or rain (so long as water doesn't get in through the top obv) and the shoe soles and tread have held up well. The small rubber tab up near the front of the toe has started to separate from the boot, but it has not affected the waterproof quality at all. I have dumped buckets worth of water on my feet and they have stayed dry.3. They are insulated, but not to the degree of a winter boot. I have worn them in snow and that is just fine, but after a while it does start to get cold around the toes. Insulated but the Gore-tex isn't on par with real, winter insulated boots, but that is to be expected if you want to be wearing these all summer long.4. As someone with an inconvenient foot condition requiring specific insoles in all shoes, these both have the space and the support to accommodate orthopedic inserts (unlike the Oboz I tried a few years back).5. They scuff pretty easily but hiking boots aren't meant to be pretty and cute. If you're gonna wear these daily, they're gonna look like you actually live life.All in all, I have been impressed with this shoe and all that I have put it through in just a few months. So far it has performed as expected, especially as a work boot. I would definitely take these on a well-maintained trail, on day hikes of one or two day overnights in the backcountry, but for particularly technical or intense hikes maybe look for a more expensive shoe.
I thought this boot was good looking in the store. A more classic look than all the rest. But the real shock was the price and value. I pay 50% more for trail running shoes. I purchased 11.5 in wide. The reason I wanted this type of boot was it is waterproof and slightly sturdier than my trail running shoes. The sole is a nice middle between the trail shoe and traditional Vibram soles on more expensive boots which can be much stiffer. I was going to be in mixed weather as well as home in CA so being a mid height boot that's relatively light was the right move. Because I've had toe surgery and some metatarsal issues, I added another insole with some arch support as well as a 1/4" meta pad. The wide option allowed me to customize the fit to suit. The last 2 weeks have ... MoreI thought this boot was good looking in the store. A more classic look than all the rest. But the real shock was the price and value. I pay 50% more for trail running shoes. I purchased 11.5 in wide. The reason I wanted this type of boot was it is waterproof and slightly sturdier than my trail running shoes. The sole is a nice middle between the trail shoe and traditional Vibram soles on more expensive boots which can be much stiffer. I was going to be in mixed weather as well as home in CA so being a mid height boot that's relatively light was the right move. Because I've had toe surgery and some metatarsal issues, I added another insole with some arch support as well as a 1/4" meta pad. The wide option allowed me to customize the fit to suit. The last 2 weeks have been hiking in the Wind River Range, the Big Horns and in Silverton. All my hiking was with just a day pack so not much weight but 10-17 miles a day. No issues whatsoever. No material defects and good traction, wet and dry terrain. Well maybe one. The long laces. I either double knot, or loop a second time the upper hooks. I do plan to get some shorter laces.
I really liked these boots initially. They were the most comfortable hiking boots I'd ever had, with very little break-in required. I found that the waterproof claim also held up for me. My socks never got wet despite hiking in heavy rain, or stepping in streams and puddles. That being said, I wouldn't mistake them for rubber boots.The biggest downside is the sole. It looks like a Vibram sole, but it isn't. After five or six hikes the boots didn't have much traction because the sole was almost worn smooth at the ball of the foot. I ended up replacing them with another, more durable brand after just 3 months of use.If you're looking for an inexpensive boot to use on just an occasional hike, then these would be fine. If you want something longer lasting I'd suggest ... MoreI really liked these boots initially. They were the most comfortable hiking boots I'd ever had, with very little break-in required. I found that the waterproof claim also held up for me. My socks never got wet despite hiking in heavy rain, or stepping in streams and puddles. That being said, I wouldn't mistake them for rubber boots.The biggest downside is the sole. It looks like a Vibram sole, but it isn't. After five or six hikes the boots didn't have much traction because the sole was almost worn smooth at the ball of the foot. I ended up replacing them with another, more durable brand after just 3 months of use.If you're looking for an inexpensive boot to use on just an occasional hike, then these would be fine. If you want something longer lasting I'd suggest you look further.
Riddle: What Mount Albert, Gros Morne, L'Acropole des Draveurs or Table Lands all have in common?Answer: MEN'S MT. MADDSEN WATERPROOF HIKING BOOTS (black)At the end of all these hikes, they were in a way better shape than I was, but I would be in an almost catastrophic situation without them. Boy, I wish I could have these during my military service! They are life savers. Correction: they are feet, knees and back savers. But sorry, you still have to do the walking, they don't do it for you. I have weak ankles and bad knees, and I still managed to do all these hikes with the help of these boots. The medium ankle support (leather) is good enough for an average-difficult hike and holds you tight enough to avoid blisters or toes pain due to excessive foot play ... MoreRiddle: What Mount Albert, Gros Morne, L'Acropole des Draveurs or Table Lands all have in common?Answer: MEN'S MT. MADDSEN WATERPROOF HIKING BOOTS (black)At the end of all these hikes, they were in a way better shape than I was, but I would be in an almost catastrophic situation without them. Boy, I wish I could have these during my military service! They are life savers. Correction: they are feet, knees and back savers. But sorry, you still have to do the walking, they don't do it for you. I have weak ankles and bad knees, and I still managed to do all these hikes with the help of these boots. The medium ankle support (leather) is good enough for an average-difficult hike and holds you tight enough to avoid blisters or toes pain due to excessive foot play inside (especially downhill). But the strength of these boots is the multiple layers sole. The inner one is comfortable yet stiff enough to support your foot well (after wearing them 14 hours my feet were not sore yet) and to attenuate the walking and jumping impacts: it did not kill my knees going downhill (low vibrations and stress to the ankles, knees, legs and toes). Note: I wore these pair of shoes without breaking them in with no problems!!! The outer layer is strong and durable enough to match the mountain trails hardness while it has a safe grip on rocks (wet and dry) or dusty trails, uphill and downhill. And all of these at a fraction of the price of a "specialized" pair of boots. Disclaimer: I did not use them in winter/slash conditions or marsh, only summer/vacation time.
It won't show that I bought these boots because I returned a pair of boots from another company and exchanged them for the Timberland Mt. Maddsen.Since then I have put on close to 100 miles in the desert. I love these boots. Very supportive, feel lighter then the 3 lbs. Great looking boot as well. Can't attest to the WP since I walk the desert, no stream crossings. As always I would say try on the boots, shoes, before buying. I didn't on the first pair which is why I ended up exchanging for the Timberland. Also, the price is fantastic.
I wanted to wait 6 months to review these boots because I was looking for a pair of hiking boots that was genuinely waterproof. I hike in some very wet climates so waterproofing is very important to me. I've had to return a few pair of boots that claimed to be waterproof but just weren't. After 6 months, 92 hikes and 498.6 miles, I can say that these boots are the best I've experienced yet and they're not even the most expensive! I have only experienced a very tiny leak on the seam of my right boot by the pinky toe, but otherwise they have kept me dry. I use Sno-seal to keep them waterproofed and I would highly recommend this hiking boot. I'm 54 years old, 6 foot 2 inches tall, wear a size 13 and hike all over the US but primarily in northeast Ohio and the Cuyahoga ... MoreI wanted to wait 6 months to review these boots because I was looking for a pair of hiking boots that was genuinely waterproof. I hike in some very wet climates so waterproofing is very important to me. I've had to return a few pair of boots that claimed to be waterproof but just weren't. After 6 months, 92 hikes and 498.6 miles, I can say that these boots are the best I've experienced yet and they're not even the most expensive! I have only experienced a very tiny leak on the seam of my right boot by the pinky toe, but otherwise they have kept me dry. I use Sno-seal to keep them waterproofed and I would highly recommend this hiking boot. I'm 54 years old, 6 foot 2 inches tall, wear a size 13 and hike all over the US but primarily in northeast Ohio and the Cuyahoga Valley National Park.
I have to agree with some of the other reviewers and say that it's either quality control issues or craftsmanship issues that plague this boot. I purchased this pair of boots in the fall of 2021 and have not been happy. My pair doesn't have as many issues as some of the others, but the ones that we have in common are around extra material being sewn into or around the seams. My biggest problem is where the tongue meets the boot around the ankle there is a huge ball of hard extra material. The pain this causes on even the shortest day trips makes them unbearably painful to wear. The tread is nice and fairly aggressive, and they do fit nicely into my snowshoes. The toe box is a little too narrow to allow for a good wool sock and liner and the bootstrap is flimsy.
I had to try these on after reading the hype in reviews. I bought my standard size (12W) and they fit well and the wide is welcoming. They have a traditional lacing system which allows for a lot of creativity. They are designed like a beefy leather hiking boot, but built in a casual but quality way. I will use them for my quick local hikes, maybe even a lightweight overnight. Could even be styled up in a semi-retro look around town. For $100 you get what you pay for, a casual hiking boot that has classic features and appears good quality. IMO, the average line of keen, oboz, merrell, lowa etc. are hybrids between the scale of a casual boot and a capable, beefy backpacking boot. I prefer to have a tool do one job really well. Get a boot like this for less demanding ... MoreI had to try these on after reading the hype in reviews. I bought my standard size (12W) and they fit well and the wide is welcoming. They have a traditional lacing system which allows for a lot of creativity. They are designed like a beefy leather hiking boot, but built in a casual but quality way. I will use them for my quick local hikes, maybe even a lightweight overnight. Could even be styled up in a semi-retro look around town. For $100 you get what you pay for, a casual hiking boot that has classic features and appears good quality. IMO, the average line of keen, oboz, merrell, lowa etc. are hybrids between the scale of a casual boot and a capable, beefy backpacking boot. I prefer to have a tool do one job really well. Get a boot like this for less demanding day hikes and the likes of Zamberlan or Asolo for the scree fields in Banff, no in between.
I have 2 pairs of these bought about a year apart. The first pair I love (4 or 5 stars), so I bought a 2nd pair, but the second pair is incredibly uncomfortable (1 or 2 stars). The top lace anchor digs into my ankle and hurts. I have been hoping they'd break in, but I'm gonna return them. How can they be so different? I have to assume quality control is severely lacking, or different factories have different specs, or something. I hike in them and use them as work boots, so wearing them is an all-day thing. At the end of the day in the good pair I'm happy; the bad pair I'm miserable.
| Product Dimensions | |
| Length | 14.13 in |
| Height | 5.15 in |
| Width | 10.27 in |
