Features: Want to save space on your mobile device by running apps from a memory card? Transcend's microSDXC/SDHC 300S cards are the right choice! Compliant with the latest speed class, the cards boast excellent random read/write speed, perfect for retrieving small pieces of data from random locations and speeding app launch time.
Features: Want to save space on your mobile device by running apps from a memory card? Transcend's microSDXC/SDHC 300S cards are the right choice! Compliant with the latest speed class, the cards boast excellent random read/write speed, perfect for retrieving small pieces of data from random locations and speeding app launch time.
Features: Want to save space on your mobile device by running apps from a memory card? Transcend's microSDXC/SDHC 300S cards are the right choice! Compliant with the latest speed class, the cards boast excellent random read/write speed, perfect for retrieving small pieces of data from random locations and speeding app launch time.
Features: Want to save space on your mobile device by running apps from a memory card? Transcend's microSDXC/SDHC 300S cards are the right choice! Compliant with the latest speed class, the cards boast excellent random read/write speed, perfect for retrieving small pieces of data from random locations and speeding app launch time.
Last updated at 03/13/2026 16:07:44
FFCTRATS64GUSD300S-1 Transcend 64Gb Uhs-I U1 Microsd W/ O Adapter (Microsdhc I C10 U1) (FFCTRATS64GUSD300S-1)
Delivery between 19–23 Mar $15
originally posted on lazada.com.ph
Functionality:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ (5.0) Quality:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ (5.0) Material:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ (5.0)Performance:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ (5.0)Packaging: ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️(5.0)Overall Rating: ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ (5.0)✔️ ⚠️ A common concern among users/buyers is whether they've been deceived or scammed, given that the microSD card's capacity doesn't precisely match the advertised 64 GB. I advise acquiring information first before giving a very low rating to this product.✅️ Now about this sucker, As soon as I inserted this microSD card into my phone, Android formatted it and created folders/directories for allocations. In terms of performance, I was surprised to find it faster than Lexar in certain capabilities. I just hope it lasts longer.
originally posted on homeessentialsdirect.com
Very nice for the price, Added to 2 dashcams. Speed should be good, temp range is good. We shall see how many cycles it will last but rated for 10,000 insertion/removal cycles. I'll report back if/when they croak. TLC NAND flash. In a 1gb SEQ Q32T1 test in crystaldiskmark Sustained Read =~96mb/s Sustained Write =~23.3mb/s ----------------------------------------------------------------------- CrystalDiskMark 5.5.0 x64 (C) 2007-2017 hiyohiyo Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- * MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [SATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s] * KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 96.749 MB/s Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 23.303 MB/s Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : ... MoreVery nice for the price, Added to 2 dashcams. Speed should be good, temp range is good. We shall see how many cycles it will last but rated for 10,000 insertion/removal cycles. I'll report back if/when they croak. TLC NAND flash. In a 1gb SEQ Q32T1 test in crystaldiskmark Sustained Read =~96mb/s Sustained Write =~23.3mb/s ----------------------------------------------------------------------- CrystalDiskMark 5.5.0 x64 (C) 2007-2017 hiyohiyo Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- * MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [SATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s] * KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 96.749 MB/s Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 23.303 MB/s Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 11.125 MB/s [ 2716.1 IOPS] Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 1.591 MB/s [ 388.4 IOPS] Sequential Read (T= 1) : 96.050 MB/s Sequential Write (T= 1) : 18.242 MB/s Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 10.766 MB/s [ 2628.4 IOPS] Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 1.347 MB/s [ 328.9 IOPS] Test : 1024 MiB [F: 0.0% (0.0/29.8 GiB)] (x2) [Interval=5 sec] Date : 2018/07/05 23:26:15 OS : Windows 10 Professional [10.0 Build 17134] (x64)
| Weight (Max.) | 0.4 g (0.01 oz) |
| Capacity | 64 GB |
| Flash Type | TLC NAND flash |
FFCTRATS64GUSD300S-1 Transcend 64Gb Uhs-I U1 Microsd W/ O Adapter (Microsdhc I C10 U1) (FFCTRATS64GUSD300S-1)
Delivery between 19–23 Mar $15
Functionality:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ (5.0) Quality:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ (5.0) Material:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ (5.0)Performance:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ (5.0)Packaging: ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️(5.0)Overall Rating: ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ (5.0)✔️ ⚠️ A common concern among users/buyers is whether they've been deceived or scammed, given that the microSD card's capacity doesn't precisely match the advertised 64 GB. I advise acquiring information first before giving a very low rating to this product.✅️ Now about this sucker, As soon as I inserted this microSD card into my phone, Android formatted it and created folders/directories for allocations. In terms of performance, I was surprised to find it faster than Lexar in certain capabilities. I just hope it lasts longer.
Very nice for the price, Added to 2 dashcams. Speed should be good, temp range is good. We shall see how many cycles it will last but rated for 10,000 insertion/removal cycles. I'll report back if/when they croak. TLC NAND flash. In a 1gb SEQ Q32T1 test in crystaldiskmark Sustained Read =~96mb/s Sustained Write =~23.3mb/s ----------------------------------------------------------------------- CrystalDiskMark 5.5.0 x64 (C) 2007-2017 hiyohiyo Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- * MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [SATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s] * KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 96.749 MB/s Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 23.303 MB/s Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : ... MoreVery nice for the price, Added to 2 dashcams. Speed should be good, temp range is good. We shall see how many cycles it will last but rated for 10,000 insertion/removal cycles. I'll report back if/when they croak. TLC NAND flash. In a 1gb SEQ Q32T1 test in crystaldiskmark Sustained Read =~96mb/s Sustained Write =~23.3mb/s ----------------------------------------------------------------------- CrystalDiskMark 5.5.0 x64 (C) 2007-2017 hiyohiyo Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- * MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [SATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s] * KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 96.749 MB/s Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 23.303 MB/s Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 11.125 MB/s [ 2716.1 IOPS] Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 1.591 MB/s [ 388.4 IOPS] Sequential Read (T= 1) : 96.050 MB/s Sequential Write (T= 1) : 18.242 MB/s Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 10.766 MB/s [ 2628.4 IOPS] Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 1.347 MB/s [ 328.9 IOPS] Test : 1024 MiB [F: 0.0% (0.0/29.8 GiB)] (x2) [Interval=5 sec] Date : 2018/07/05 23:26:15 OS : Windows 10 Professional [10.0 Build 17134] (x64)
| Weight (Max.) | 0.4 g (0.01 oz) |
| Capacity | 64 GB |
| Flash Type | TLC NAND flash |
